DIY Free AI
Best Automation Tools for Business

Best Tools

Find the tools that will work best for you.

Automated Workflow Tools:

n8n
n8n offers a hybrid approach with both self-hostable open-source software and a managed cloud service. Its pricing structure depends on which version you use: the open-source version is free to download and run yourself (though requiring your own infrastructure costs), while the cloud version has paid tiers based on the number of workflow executions per month, starting with a free tier that has significant limitations on executions and features. In terms of required expertise, self-hosting n8n requires technical skills for setup, maintenance, and potentially database management. The cloud version significantly lowers the technical barrier, providing a visual low-code/no-code interface to build workflows, but understanding API concepts and logical flow is still beneficial for complex automations, placing its required expertise typically in the mid-level range.

ActivePieces
ActivePieces is another workflow automation tool with an open-source core that can be self-hosted or used via their managed cloud service. Self-hosting the open-source version is free, requiring only your own server costs and technical effort for deployment and updates. The cloud version operates on paid plans, usually structured around the number of tasks or flows executed, and typically includes a free tier with limited usage to allow users to start and test. Similar to n8n, self-hosting demands technical expertise for setup and maintenance. The cloud version aims for a user-friendly low-code experience, making it accessible to users with mid-level technical knowledge, though the complexity of the workflow you build will dictate the actual skill needed.

Flowise AI
Flowise AI is an open-source, low-code platform that simplifies the creation and deployment of AI agents and Large Language Model (LLM) workflows. It offers both a self-hostable version and a managed cloud service. The open-source version is free to download and run, though it incurs your own infrastructure costs and requires technical expertise for setup, maintenance, and potentially database management. Flowise Cloud provides paid tiers that offer a more streamlined experience with a visual drag-and-drop interface, significantly lowering the technical barrier. While the cloud version handles much of the underlying infrastructure, a basic understanding of AI concepts and logical flow is still beneficial for building complex automations, placing its required expertise in the low to mid-level range, making it accessible to a wide range of users from developers to those with less coding experience.

Make.com
Make.com (formerly Integromat) is a powerful, purely SaaS-based workflow automation platform known for its visual, modular builder that allows for complex scenarios and branching logic. Its cost is based on paid subscription tiers, primarily determined by the number of "operations" (tasks) executed per month and the number of active "scenarios" (workflows). There is a free tier available, offering a limited number of operations and scenarios, suitable for personal use or testing basic automations. The required expertise for Make.com is generally considered low-to-mid level. While its visual interface is user-friendly for building basic flows, mastering its full capabilities for complex branching, error handling, and data transformation often requires strong logical thinking and a willingness to learn its specific modular approach, making it more powerful but potentially having a slightly steeper initial learning curve for some compared to simpler tools.

Zapier
Zapier is one of the most popular and longest-standing SaaS workflow automation tools, focusing on simple event-action automations called "Zaps." Its pricing is based on paid subscription tiers primarily differentiated by the number of tasks processed per month, the number of "Zaps" you can have active, and access to premium features like multi-step Zaps, filters, and formatters. Zapier offers a free tier which allows a limited number of simple, single-step Zaps, making it easy to start and test basic integrations. Zapier is widely recognized for requiring the lowest level of expertise among these tools, being designed specifically as a no-code platform. Its interface is highly intuitive ("When this happens in App A, do that in App B"), making it accessible to non-technical users and businesses with minimal training.

Summary
These four tools represent different approaches to workflow automation, catering to a spectrum of users and technical requirements. Zapier is the most accessible no-code option with a vast integration library, best suited for simpler event-action automations for non-technical users. Make.com provides a more powerful visual builder for creating complex, multi-step scenarios, suitable for users who need more advanced logic without necessarily writing code. n8n, Flowise and ActivePieces offer open-source alternatives that can be self-hosted for maximum control and privacy (requiring technical expertise) or used via managed cloud services that provide a low-to-mid-code experience similar to Make.com, appealing to users who value open-source principles or need extensive customization. The choice between them often depends on the user's technical skill level, budget, the complexity of required automations, and whether self-hosting is a consideration.

LLM chat models:

Google Gemini
Google Gemini offers various models, including free access to base versions (like Gemini Nano or the standard Gemini interface) and paid tiers (Gemini Advanced via Google One AI Premium) for access to more capable models like Ultra. Its strengths lie in its multimodal capabilities, strong coding performance, and increasing integration with the Google ecosystem (Docs, Sheets, Gmail). Weaknesses can include occasional inconsistencies compared to competitors and the fact that the most advanced models are locked behind a subscription, while the free tier offers a less powerful experience.

Anthropic Claude
Anthropic's Claude provides a free tier with usage limits and paid subscriptions (Claude Pro, Claude Team) for higher usage, priority access, and better models (Sonnet, Opus). A major strength is its exceptionally long context window, allowing it to process very large documents or conversations, alongside a focus on ethical alignment and safety ("constitutional AI"). Its weaknesses include less general knowledge breadth than some competitors in certain domains and it can sometimes be overly cautious or refuse requests due to its safety guidelines.

OpenAI ChatGPT
OpenAI's ChatGPT offers a widely used free tier based on the GPT-3.5 model, with paid subscriptions (ChatGPT Plus, Team, Enterprise) providing access to the more advanced GPT-4 model, faster responses, and additional features like plugins/browsing. Its strengths include broad general knowledge, strong creative writing abilities, a robust plugin ecosystem (though evolving), and being the pioneer that popularized AI chatbots. Potential weaknesses include the free tier using an older model, occasional factual inaccuracies or "hallucinations," and a context window that is generally smaller than Claude's top models.

Perplexity
Perplexity is less of a traditional conversational chatbot and more of an AI-powered answer engine focused on real-time information retrieval and synthesis. It has a free tier that provides basic answers with sources, and a paid Pro tier that uses more advanced models (including access to GPT-4, Claude Opus, etc.) and offers more features like Copilot queries. Its primary strength is its ability to quickly find, summarize, and cite information from the web, making it excellent for research and factual questions. A weakness is that it's less suitable for purely creative, open-ended, or persona-based conversational tasks that don't require external factual lookup.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek focuses significantly on developer use cases, offering access to its models primarily through API calls rather than a polished consumer chat interface, though playgrounds exist. It provides a free tier for API usage up to a certain limit, with paid usage beyond that. DeepSeek is particularly strong in coding assistance and performance on developer-centric benchmarks, often offering competitive performance at a lower cost than some alternatives. Its main weakness for general users is the lack of a dedicated, user-friendly consumer chat application compared to the others, and its general knowledge/creative capabilities may be less refined than models specifically tuned for broad conversational AI.

Grok
Developed by Elon Musk's xAI, Grok is unique in its distribution and personality. It is exclusively available to subscribers of X Premium+, having no separate free tier or public API access outside of the X platform. Its key strength is its ability to access and process real-time information from the X (formerly Twitter) platform and its deliberately irreverent or witty tone. Weaknesses include its exclusivity to a specific subscription service, its tone can be unpredictable or off-putting for some users, and it has less general availability or third-party integration compared to the other major players.

Microsoft Copilot
Microsoft Copilot is Microsoft's integrated AI assistant available across its products like Windows, Office, and Bing. It offers a free version accessible via Bing or the dedicated app, often utilizing models like GPT-4 or Gemini. Paid subscriptions like Copilot Pro and Copilot for M365 provide deeper integration into Office applications, advanced features, and higher usage limits. Its primary strength is its seamless integration within the vast Microsoft ecosystem, enhancing productivity within familiar tools like Word and Excel, while also providing web-connected AI capabilities. A weakness is that the free version is more constrained, and the value of the paid versions is tied directly to reliance on Microsoft's other software, potentially offering less utility for users outside that ecosystem.

Summary
This diverse landscape of LLM chat models offers varying strengths tailored to different needs. OpenAI's ChatGPT remains a popular generalist with a strong ecosystem, while Google's Gemini leverages multimodal capabilities and integrates with its vast ecosystem. Microsoft Copilot integrates AI deeply into the Windows and Office experience, focusing heavily on productivity within those tools. Anthropic's Claude stands out for its safety focus and huge context window, excellent for complex documents. Perplexity is a dedicated tool for research and factual queries with citations. DeepSeek targets developers with strong coding performance and competitive API pricing, while Grok offers real-time insights from X with a unique, opinionated style, available only through a specific subscription. The choice often depends on the user's specific requirements, willingness to pay, and preferred model behavior.

AI code assistants:

Google AI Studio
Google AI Studio is primarily a web-based tool designed for developers to prototype and experiment with Google's generative AI models, particularly the Gemini family, often with a focus on multi-modal capabilities and function calling. It offers a free tier for experimentation with API usage limits, with paid tiers via Google Cloud's Vertex AI platform. Its strength lies in providing an accessible interface to test prompts, chain models, and explore the capabilities of Google's latest models before integrating them into applications. A weakness is that it is not a direct code editor integration tool; it's more for building and testing prompts/applications using code, rather than assisting with writing code directly within an IDE like dedicated code assistants.

Bolt.new / Bolt.diy
Bolt.new and Bolt.diy (now often referred to collectively under the Bolt brand for developers) are AI tools focused on executing larger, more complex code tasks autonomously within a codebase, going beyond simple suggestions. Bolt.new offers a more guided, often GUI-driven experience, while Bolt.diy provides a command-line interface for developers. They typically offer free usage tiers with limits and paid plans for higher capacity. Their main strength is their ability to handle multi-file tasks like implementing features or fixing bugs across a project with minimal human intervention after the initial instruction. A weakness is that they are less suited for the rapid, moment-to-moment code completion or suggestion typical of other AI assistants and require explicit, well-defined tasks.

Cursor
Cursor is an IDE (Integrated Development Environment) built from the ground up with AI deeply integrated into the coding workflow. It is a fork of VS Code, making it familiar to many developers. It offers a free tier with limited AI usage and paid plans (Pro) for increased usage, access to better models, and collaboration features. Its strength is the seamless integration of AI features directly within the editor – users can chat with the AI about their code, edit code using natural language prompts, or ask the AI to generate code based on context. A weakness is that it requires users to switch to a new IDE (even if familiar), and the free tier's AI usage is quite limited for frequent use.

Anthropic Claude
Anthropic's Claude is a powerful general-purpose large language model that is frequently used by developers for coding tasks via its chat interface or API, although it doesn't offer direct IDE integration out-of-the-box. It has a free chat tier with usage limits and paid tiers (Pro, Team, API access) for more capacity and access to stronger models like Claude Opus, known for their large context windows. Its strengths for coding include strong reasoning abilities, excellent code explanation, debugging help, and the ability to process very large code files or contexts due to its long context window. A weakness is that using it as a code assistant typically involves copy-pasting code into and out of a chat interface, which is less efficient than integrated inline suggestions.

GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is one of the most widely used AI code assistants, providing inline code suggestions and completions directly within popular code editors like VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, and others. It is primarily a paid subscription service ($10/month or $100/year for individuals) with free access often provided for verified students, teachers, and maintainers of popular open-source projects. Its main strength is its speed and convenience in suggesting code, entire lines, or even functions as you type, significantly speeding up repetitive coding tasks and boilerplate generation. Weaknesses include the cost (no persistent free tier for most users), suggestions not always being correct or optimal (requiring careful review), and potential concerns around licensing of generated code trained on public repositories.

Tabnine
Tabnine is another well-established AI code completion tool that integrates into many different IDEs. It offers a free tier providing basic code completion suggestions often based on public code, and paid tiers (Pro, Enterprise) that offer more context-aware suggestions, support for training on private codebases, and more extensive capabilities. Its strength is its wide compatibility with various programming languages and editors and its ability (in paid tiers) to provide suggestions tailored to a company's internal code standards by training on private repositories. A weakness is that its free tier is generally less powerful than paid options, and it focuses primarily on completion rather than broader AI assistance like code explanations or debugging conversations.

Summary
The landscape of AI code assistants offers a range of tools catering to different aspects of the development workflow. Tools like GitHub Copilot and Tabnine focus on providing rapid, inline code completion within your existing editor. Cursor offers a deeply integrated AI experience by building the AI directly into a familiar IDE environment. Bolt.new/Bolt.diy target more complex, autonomous tasks that might involve modifying code across multiple files. Google AI Studio is useful for prototyping and experimenting with AI models for coding applications but isn't an in-editor assistant. Claude, while a general-purpose powerful LLM, is frequently used for coding tasks like explanations and debugging via chat due to its strong reasoning and large context window, despite lacking direct inline integration. The best choice depends heavily on whether you need quick typing assistance, deep AI integration in your editor, help with larger code tasks, or a powerful model for explaining and debugging code.